this would be MY child, of course
Aug. 23rd, 2007 11:31 amI wish I could find size 2T panties with any of the following themes: dinosaurs, robots, Thomas the Tank Engine, or Red Sox logo. I'm not SURE that any of these would endear themselves to Sophia enough to spark an interest in panty-wearing (and the resulting commitment to regular potty-sitting). But, trying to guess what would work, I'd rank any of these themes way, way above Micky Mouse, Cinderella, Strawberry Shortcake, or bunny rabbits, which appear on the girl's underwear they sell at Sears. Of course, we looked at these panties at Sears. Of course, Sophia was not interested. Of course, she wanted to look at the "dinosaur panties", and wasn't quite pleased with the explanation that oh, those with the dinosaurs weren't panties, they were briefs for little boys, little boys are different...
Of course, it would be fairly easy to find BRIEFS with any of these themes. Rich says, offer her the option to wear briefs? So what if the fit is a little strange? But just how gender-warped do we want to get here?
Then there's the idea that we get out the silk-screening kit and print up our own custom batch of dinosaur, robot, Thomas, and Red Sox panties. First step, find blank size 2T panties to silkscreen onto. So far that's not trivial. Hanes sells packages of 6 assorted size 2/3 panties, 2 out of the 6 plain white (except for a bit of color on the elastic), the other 4 of which are either too dark or too busy to print onto. Well, maybe. Next step, to look into what I can do with silk-screening.
Of course, it would be fairly easy to find BRIEFS with any of these themes. Rich says, offer her the option to wear briefs? So what if the fit is a little strange? But just how gender-warped do we want to get here?
Then there's the idea that we get out the silk-screening kit and print up our own custom batch of dinosaur, robot, Thomas, and Red Sox panties. First step, find blank size 2T panties to silkscreen onto. So far that's not trivial. Hanes sells packages of 6 assorted size 2/3 panties, 2 out of the 6 plain white (except for a bit of color on the elastic), the other 4 of which are either too dark or too busy to print onto. Well, maybe. Next step, to look into what I can do with silk-screening.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 03:49 pm (UTC)Good luck!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:03 pm (UTC)One very important function of the "pretty panties" is that, when she destroys a pair thru neglect, those panties are thrown away as ruined. This is the training power of shame.
But for that reason, the panties also have to be cheap...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 05:25 am (UTC)Get the briefs. If Grandma complains, pull out the Victoria's Secret catalog, show her the briefs, and then say, "Yeah, the other design that Sophia likes is the thongs..."
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 08:05 pm (UTC)I'll go on a limb here and suggest Gymboree as a decent source for cute patterns of dinosaurs, woodland creatures, not-actually-gendered fun clothes--though, of course, they will probably be labeled "boy" or "girl" no escaping that in the US these days), yes, I know Gymboree is not as cheap as Target (or as Walmart, for that matter) but they do have really cute patterns on a regular basis.
As in, cute, non-commercial dinosaurs that are not pointing their tasers at you.
(friend of Klingonlandlady, not sure why I ended up seeing this post, but there you go....)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 06:29 pm (UTC)Especially if they looked like this:
That girl's got taste.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 07:05 pm (UTC)I also agree with
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 09:08 pm (UTC)